What you ate
Your average across the whole stretch, including the days it went badly. An honest average beats a flattering one. This only works if the input is real.
How careful does the tracking need to be?
Careful. This is the number everything else depends on, and it's the one people get wrong. Under-reporting by a fifth or more is common and almost never deliberate. The oil in the pan, the handful from someone else's plate, the weekend, drinks.
If you weren't weighing food, treat the result as a rough direction rather than a figure. And if the answer comes out surprisingly low, the likeliest explanation isn't a slow metabolism. It's that the real intake was higher than the logged one.
What the scale did
Use weekly averages, not single mornings. Take every weigh-in from your first week and average them, then do the same for your last week. Single days swing by a kilo on salt and sleep alone.
Why averages, and why two weeks minimum?
Body weight is mostly water on any given day. Salt, carbohydrate, a hard workout, poor sleep, hormones and what's still in your gut can move the scale by more than a week of real fat loss.
Averaging a week of weigh-ins cancels most of that noise. Comparing two averages a fortnight apart cancels most of the rest. One week is not enough, and comparing two single mornings is close to useless.
What the formula predicted
Optional. If you have the daily total from the calculator, put it here and you'll see how far off the estimate was.